A review of the community schools model: implications for future practice

Community schools aim to transform public schools into social centers, serving multiple social and civic needs. Although the concept emerged in the early 20th century, the modern era of community schools began in the early 1990s, as research revealed that fostering community partnerships and emphasizing family well-being in schools in low socioeconomic areas improved academic achievement.

This report examines the community schools model as a place-based strategy to reduce barriers to educational achievement for students in high-poverty communities. Drawing on decades of research and practice, IU Public Policy Institute analysts traced the historical development of full-service community schools, reviewing evidence on how integrating student supports, expanding extracurricular opportunities, and strengthening family and community engagement can influence student outcomes.

PPI analysts synthesized existing evaluations to assess what is known about the effectiveness of community schools, highlighting both promising results—such as improvements in attendance, school climate, and family engagement—and limitations in the evidence base, particularly regarding academic achievement and variation across local contexts. They also examined the theoretical foundations of the model, the key local and institutional conditions that shape implementation, and recurring challenges involving partnerships, data infrastructure, and long-term funding.

PPI analysts designed this report to guide policymakers, educators, and community leaders in planning, implementing, and expanding community schools. It outlines key considerations for effective practice and long-term impact, including evidence on cost-effectiveness and return on investment.

Key findings

  • Community schools help reduce nonacademic barriers—such as poverty, neighborhood conditions, and limited access to health and social services—that strongly influence academic performance.
  • The community schools model is built on four pillars: integrated student supports, expanded learning opportunities, family and community engagement, and collaborative leadership.
  • The model’s four pillars guide implementation, but research shows family and community engagement has the clearest academic benefits.
  • Early gains tend to appear in attendance, school climate, and engagement, while academic progress tends to develop more gradually and is not guaranteed.
  • Strong core instruction is essential; community services cannot substitute for high-quality teaching.
  • Effective, well-funded, and well-coordinated community school efforts can be highly cost-effective, often generating substantial long-term returns on investment.